32-Bit RISC-V Embedded Processor and Subsystem, Maps ARM M-0 to M-4. Optimal PPA,
FPGA Design Needs More Than a Face Lift
FPGA design success is based on the promise of getting to hardware fast, while performing system debug on actual hardware. Constant re-spins, including architectural/design changes, are performed until the FPGA meets system requirements. This method works for smaller devices, but obviously fails for high-end FPGAs because the resulting unpredictable design schedules imply unacceptable product slippages and unrealized business.
Related News
- Gidel Launches Lossless Compression IP that Reduces Storage Needs by Over 50%, Utilizing Only 1% of the FPGA, with Low Power Consumption
- Intel FPGA Technology Supports NEC in Face Recognition Technology
- STMicro face-recognition processor includes FPGA core
- intoPIX Unveils Latest JPEG XS FPGA Cores with Nextera-Adeas ST2110/IPMX, Streamlining IPMX Development at NAB Show
- Efinix Rolls Out Line of FPGAs to Accelerate and Adapt Automotive Designs and Applications
Breaking News
- Credo at TSMC 2024 North America Technology Symposium
- Cadence Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results
- Rambus Advances AI 2.0 with GDDR7 Memory Controller IP
- Faraday Reports First Quarter 2024 Results
- RAAAM Memory Technologies Closes $4M Seed Round to Commercialize Super Cost Effective On-Chip Memory Solutions
Most Popular
- GUC provides 3DIC ASIC total service package to AI/HPC/Networking customers
- Omni Design Technologies Joins Intel Foundry Accelerator IP Alliance
- Faraday Partners with Arm to Innovate AI-driven Vehicle ASICs
- Semiconductor Capacity Is Up, But Mind the Talent Gap
- Efabless Announces the Release of the OpenLane 2 Development Platform, Transforming Custom Silicon Design Flows
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |