Are ESL and DFM false hopes?
EE Times: Are ESL and DFM false hopes? | |
Richard Goering (07/25/2005 9:00 AM EDT) URL: http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=166401410 | |
Observers hope that two technologies at opposite ends of the design cycle-electronic system-level (ESL) design and design-for-manufacturability (DFM)-will return the EDA industry to solid growth. But due to the nature of the ESL and DFM problems, that hope may be difficult to realize. The traditional EDA model is to build software packages that can be used by thousands of engineers across many applications. That works for older technologies but not for ESL or DFM, which is why those technologies have become prime areas for in-house tool development. ESL lacks precise definitions, but it can be used to describe activities that take place before RTL coding. The problem with ESL is that it is typically specific to the domain space and the application. This is why several panelists at the recent Design Automation Conference said they're developing their own ESL tools, partnering with universities or using open-source SystemC tools. This is also why, in the recent EE Times/Deutsche Bank 2005 EDA survey, system-level design was found to be a key area for internal tool development. With all the hype about ESL tools, electronics OEMs can't find the tools they need in the commercial market. It's not because EDA vendors are lazy; it's because the needs are so company-specific. There is one very successful "generic" ESL tool, and that's Matlab from The Mathworks, but with a price of around $2,000, it's one or two orders of magnitude below what the big EDA vendors are used to. The problem with DFM is that you have to be close to the foundry. Just getting some packaged DFM rules in a library is no longer enough at 65 nanometers and below. There will be a need for statistical yield modeling and detailed, calibrated process models. Foundries are reluctant to give out the needed proprietary information, so many foundries and IDMs are likely to develop their own DFM tools. The result is that EDA may have to become more of a services industry. Actively partnering with the people who have the applications-or with the foundries-will be crucial. --- The Art of Design column offers opinions and perspectives on the technology, techniques and business of electronics design. Its subject matter covers design automation, test, packaging, boards and silicon. Suggestions or comments may be sent to rgoering@cmp.com.
| |
- - | |
Related News
- IC Industry Slowdown: True or False?
- ESL tools: Are EDA giants in the game?
- Why have all broadcast powerhouses embraced intoPIX JPEG XS? Unraveling the secret behind industry leaders' unanimous adoption!
- What does Renesas' acquisition of PCB toolmaker Altium mean?
- Synopsys plus Ansys: The making of an EDA giant?
Breaking News
- Omni Design Technologies Joins Intel Foundry Accelerator IP Alliance
- Efabless Announces the Release of the OpenLane 2 Development Platform, Transforming Custom Silicon Design Flows
- TSMC Reports First Quarter EPS of NT$8.70
- Brisbane Silicon publishes DPTx 1.4 IP Core
- GUC provides 3DIC ASIC total service package to AI/HPC/Networking customers
Most Popular
- U.S. Subsidy for TSMC Has AI Chips, Tech Leadership in Sight
- Cadence Unveils Palladium Z3 and Protium X3 Systems to Usher in a New Era of Accelerated Verification, Software Development and Digital Twins
- Zhuhai Chuangfeixin: OTP IP Based on 90nm CMOS Image Sensor Process Technology Successfully Mass Production
- Silvaco Announces Expanded Partnership with Micron Technology
- OPENEDGES Unveils ENLIGHT Pro: A High-Performance NPU IP Quadrupling its Previous Generation's Performance
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |