

Enhanced Capacitor Cross Coupled FrontEnd
Hossam Ali and Khaled Sharaf, Member, IEEE
Integrated Circuits Lab., AinShams University Cairo 11517, Egypt Abstract This paper presents two approaches to improve the performance of RF low noise amplifiers (LNAs) and downconversion mixers. One approach is for noise enhancement and the other is for improving flatness of very wide range LNA. The techniques described here are based mainly on making some enhancement on capacitive crosscoupled LNA technique. LNAs and mixers have been designed in 130nm CMOS process with 1.2V power supply. Enhanced noise figure LNA achieved a minimum noise figure of 2.2dB (taking into account the load thermal noise) with 2.4mW power consumption in LNA core only and a 4.5GHz bandwidth (1.5GHZ6GHz). Enhanced wideband LNA achieved a constant noise figure of 4.3dB over the frequency range from 0.5GHz to 15GHz with 4.2mW power consumption in LNA core only. Moreover, these same two approaches were applied to mixer circuits by simply adding a switching stage after the LNA. I. INTRODUCTION Growth of the wireless communication market puts increasing demand on low power, low cost and high performance receivers. RF LNAs and mixers are among the most critical building blocks in the receiver chain. The CMOS technology has shown its feasibility for high frequency applications. The conventional commongate lownoise amplifier (CGLNA) exhibits a relatively high noise figure (NF) at low operating frequencies relative to the MOSFET unity gain frequency , which limited its adoption notwithstanding its superior linearity, input matching, and stability compared to the inductively degenerated commonsource LNA (CSLNA). A lot of trials were made to enhance performance of common gate topology the most important of them is the noise cancellation technique [1] and capacitor cross coupled technique. This paper describes how we can make small modification on a capacitive crosscoupling technique to improve noise figure or flatness of very wide range LNA. Section II discusses noise cancellation technique for improving NF. Section III discusses capacitive crosscoupling LNA and how it overcomes the disadvantage of the initial noise cancellation technique. Section IV presents first modification that will help in improving NF. Section V present 2nd modification that help in improving flatness of very wide range LNA and, section VI will discuss how we can calibrate any LNA to be used as a mixer. II. NOISE CANCELLATION TECHNIQUE The noise cancellation technique is one of the most important techniques for decreasing noise. It depends on mixing common gate and common source topology with each other as shown in Fig(1), The interesting property of this circuit is that the fraction of M1 noise current that flows into R1 and Rs induces, by driving the gate of M2, an inphase amplified noise current in R2, if the resulting noise voltages at the two output terminals are equal, then M1’s noise is commonmode and is nulled by differential sensing. With this in mind, let us calculate the LNA noise factor with respect to Rs. Assume matching input impedance. Then the LNA noise factor is given by:
The second and third term account for M1 and M2 noise, respectively, and the last term is due to load resistor noise. This expression shows that M1’s noise contribution is zero when Disadvantages of this topology appears in two points, first due to process variation, there will be always difference between g_{m1} R_{1} & g_{m2} R_{2} and this will enlarge mismatch between IQ paths in receiver chain, so we need to try to compensate this effect on receiver backend, that will lead to complexity and will decrease receiver sensitivity. Fig.1 Schematic of Noise Cancellation technique topology. Second if we try to reconstruct our topology as shown in Fig(2) to eliminate the mismatch disadvantage (differential input – differential output), we will find from simulation results (Fig(3)), that its noise figure and power consumption will be higher than other topologies as we will see later. As a conclusion this topology is very useful only when we need single input to differential output stage. Fig. 2. Schematic of differential input differential output noise cancellation LNA III. CAPACITOR CROSS COUPLED TECHNIQUE The capacitive crosscoupling can be considered as a modification of the previous noise cancellation technique topology as it depends on the same principle. In this section, we will demonstrate how this topology can be used to improve the NF of a commongate input stage and how it tries to overcome the disadvantage of previous topology. Fig.3. Noise Figure and S11 (input port reflection power) for noise cancellation LNA Fig(4) shows the schematic of a differential commongate input stage with cross coupled inputs. It can be shown that the crosscoupling causes the noise of M1 and M2, to produce commonmode noise voltages at the output node The derived noise factor expression of the input pair M1 and M2 (assuming that capacitors C1 and C2 are assumed to be much greater than gatesource capacitance Cgs) is given by: Fig. 4. Schematic of ordinary capacitive cross coupled LNA It can be seen that due to the capacitive crosscoupling the noise contribution from the input transistors is reduced though not completely eliminated. Worthy to mention is that the derivation of the noise factor assumes that the input impedance is matched to the source impedance for maximum power transfer. Also as in previous topology matching depends on parallel combination between common source and common gate, and by assuming that input of common source is only capacitive element, we can adjust matching by transconductance of common gate (g_{m1} R_{s} = 0.5). it is also interesting to note that the capacitive crosscoupling does not add much cost and complexity. From simulation results as shown in Fig(5 & 6), although minimum noise figure for this topology is 1+ / 2 that will be around (2.4dB for = 1.5 as in deep submicron case), we notice another 1dB degradation due to load thermal noise. If we want to decrease noise we must increase load impedance as in previous equation, yet if we tried to increase load resistance value, M1 and M2 will be on triode edge. So we can not increase load impedance beyond a certain value. Another disadvantage of this topology is the fact that some standards need a larger flat band, (variation in gain and noise over all the band must be minimum as possible), which cannot be controlled in this topology.
Fig. 5. Noise Figure and S11 (input port reflection power) for cross coupled LNA Fig. 6. . Voltage gain for cross coupled LNA IV. IMPROVING NOISE CROSS COUPLE TECHNIQUE This topology mainly is useful in increasing load impedance, that leads to increasing gain and decreasing noise figure. The first idea is to add two PMOS parallel to loads as shown if Fig(7), such that current passing in the loads will be a subtraction of PMOS current from NMOS current and so decreasing the current that passes through the resistance. This means that we can increase the resistance value to get the same operating voltage at output node as in previous topology. Fig. 7. Schematic of noise enhancement capacitive cross coupled LNA As shown from simulation results Fig(8 & 9), we can note that the the decrease in noise figure is not noticeable as the PMOS stage adds a new source of noise. To decrease this new source another modification can be made on topology by cross coupling the PMOS stage as shown in Fig(10) Fig. 8. Noise Figure and S11 for enhanced cross coupled LNA Fig. 9. Voltage gain for enhanced cross coupled LNA Fig. 10 Schematic of noise enhancement capacitive cross coupled LNA As shown from simulation result Fig(11&12) that we have wide band range (1.5GHz to 6GHz) with a very small noise figure (minimum 2.2dB 2.8dB at edges). One of the most disadvantage of this topology, is the increase of loads value leading to a decrease in the dominant pole, so there will be a huge difference between maximum and minimum gain of LNA in the specified operation range. For application that need flat band LNA, we cannot use this topology except for bandwidth less than 2 GHz. From another point of view, maximum gain at 1.6GHz is 20dB and minimum Gain at 6GHz is 10 dB, which can be compensated by letting the mixer variable gain also in reverse to LNA (maximum gain at 6GHz and minimum at 1.6 GHz), for sure we cannot compensate all 10dB difference, but with PGA (programmable gain amplifier) just before analog to digital converter or before base band (depend on system) we will be able to compensate this difference completely, so we can benefit from wideband lownoise highgain frontend topology but with system compensation technique. Fig. 11 Noise Figure and S11 for enhanced cross coupled LNA Fig. 12 . Voltage gain for enhanced cross coupled LNA V. IMPROVING FLATNESS OF VERY WIDE BAND LNA In some applications it is desirable to let the entire needed band be flat (equal gain and noise), ordinary topologies do not satisfy this standard requirements. In Next topology we will add an bank of capacitors at input of cross coupled LNA. The number of this capacitors depend on frequency range needed and on maximum variation value needed. Fig(13) shows the circuit configuration of this topology, we can note that adding capacitor at input will lead to decrease in the unity gain frequency, that will lead to an increase in noise figure of the LNA. From simulation results Fig(14 & 15), we can note that, by using four parallel capacitors at input, the noise figure and gain from 0.5GHz to 15GHz is very flat. Fig.13. Schematic of a very wide capacitive cross coupled LNA VI. MIXER CALIBRATION This section presents how any of the previous topologies of LNA can be calibrated as a Mixer. We can get from each topology its advantage towards noise figure. Actually any mixer can be considered as LNA followed by switcher, this switcher converts frequency of operation upward or downward, as example for calibrating the enhanced noise figure LNA as a mixer, we will add four switchs before load resistance as shown in Fig(16). Fig. 14 . Noise Figure and S11 for enhanced cross coupled LNA Fig.15 Voltage gain for enhanced cross coupled LNA We know that for completely integrated chip, Mixer need not to be matched to 50, but for discrete component it must have matching input network, by adjusting inductor value at input we can get a variety if input resistance values at the needed operating frequency, so we can achieve requirements for both discrete or integrated levels. VII. CONCLUSION LNA and Mixer are of the most important blocks in receiver path, each topology of them has its own disadvantage and advantage. For singleinput differentialoutput stage we will prefer to use noise cancellation technique, for low noise with wide band and moderate gain we will prefer to use cross coupled technique, for very low noise standards we will prefer to use noise enhanced cross coupled technique (cross coupled NMOS and PMOS) and for very flat wide band requirements we will prefer to use wide band cross coupled technique (with capacitor bank at input). Next table summarizes some of the comparison points between different types of LNAs. TABLE I COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT LNA TYPES
Fig. 16. Schematic of noise enhancement capacitive cross coupled LNA calibrated as Mixer REFERENCES [1] Eisse Mensink, Eric A. M. Klumperink and Bram Nauta,” Distortion Cancellation by Polyphase Multipath Circuits,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and systems—I: regular papers, vol. 52, no. 9, September 2005 [2] Wei Zhuo, Sherif Embabi, José Pineda de Gyvez, Edgar SánchezSinencio,” Using Capacitive CrossCoupling Technique in RF Low Noise Amplifiers and DownConversion Mixer Design” [3] W. Zhuo, X. Li, S. Shekhar, S. H. K. Embabi, J. Pineda de Gyvez, D. J. Allstot, and E. SanchezSinencio,” A Capacitor CrossCoupled Common Gate LowNoise Amplifier,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—II: express briefs, vol. 52, no. 12, December 2005 [4] Ahmed Amer,” Design and implementation of a wideband receiver for wireless communications ,” M.S. dissertation, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt, July 2006. [5] Aly Ismail and Asad A. Abidi,” A 3–10GHz LowNoise Amplifier With Wideband LCLadder Matching Network,” IEEE Journal of Solidstate circuits, vol. 39, no. 12, December 2004 [6] Henrik Sjöland, Ali KarimiSanjaani and Asad A. Abidi,” A Merged CMOS LNA and Mixer for a WCDMA Receiver,” IEEE Journal of Solidstate circuits, vol. 38, no. 6, June 2003 [7] Vojkan Vidojkovic, Johan van der Tang, Eric Hanssen, Arjan Leeuwenburgh and Arthur van Roermund,” Fullyintegrated dect/bluetooth multiband LNA in 0.18 mm CMOS” [8] Hooman Darabi and Asad A. Abidi,” A 4.5mW 900MHz CMOS Receiver for Wireless Paging,” IEEE Journal of Solidstate circuits, vol. 35, no. 8, August 2000 [9] ChaoShiun Wang, WeiChang Li, and ChorngKuang Wang,” A multiband multistandard RF frontend for IEEE 802.16a and IEEE 802.11a/b/g applications” [10] Xiaoyong Li, Sudip Shekhar and David J. Allstot,” GmBoosted CommonGate LNA and Differential Colpitts VCO/QVCO in 0.18um CMOS ,” IEEE Journal of Solidstate circuits, vol. 40, no. 12, December 2005 [11] S. Chehrazi, A. Mirzaei, R. Bagheri and A. A. Abidi,” A 6.5 GHz Wideband CMOS Low Noise Amplifier for MultiBand Use,” IEEE 2005 CUSTOM INTEGRATED CIRCUITS CONFERENCE [12] Derek K. Shaeffer and Thomas H. Lee,” A 1.5V, 1.5GHz CMOS Low Noise Amplifier,” IEEE Journal of Solidstate circuits, vol. 32, no. 5, May 1997 
Home  Feedback  Register  Site Map 
All material on this site Copyright © 2017 Design And Reuse S.A. All rights reserved. 