When countries rush to secure the first 450mm fab

For the past few years, the debate on 450mm has been on whether the chip industry wnts it, whether the equipment industry wants it, whether it will reduce chip cost and who will fund it.

Will there be a tipping point at which chip companies and governments rush to build the first 450mm fab?

Yesterday, Malcolm Penn, CEO of analysts Future Horizons stated: “Where the first 450mm fab is located is going to be such an interesting decision – it will be loaded with politics – every country in the world will want it.”

Future Horizons has been tasked by the EC with looking at whether it’s a good idea to encourage the European semiconductor manufacturing equipment industry by undertaking to set up an EU-backed 450mm fab line in Europe.

Asked to speculate on who would build it, Penn replied, “Well TSMC has always built all its plants in Taiwan, but 450mm could be the excuse it needs to break with that.”

Intel, with its record of following the government incentives, could be another.

Alternatively a group of fables companies could ask TSMC to build a fab which they would jointly fund and take all the production from.

That would give them almost unassailable edge on the competition.

For instance. Qualcomm as saying that if 450mm is the only way to keep their chips on a 29% cost reduction curve, then 450mm is what they want.

Qualcomm, sitting on a $22 billion cash pile, could afford to have TSMC build them a 450mm fab all for themselves – giving Qualcomm an unassailable lead on the wireless industry.

Asked about the formerly reluctant equipment industry response to 450mm, Penn replied:

“The mood at Semicon West was reasonably positive on 450mm. Even Tokyo Electron, which used to be strongly against it, is reluctantly conceding it will happen.”

 

 


Comments

11 comments

  1. Yes indeed [Anonymous] I see STE’s CEO is resorting to seeking ‘loans’ from his shareholders. STE already owes its parent companies $445m and will owe them about $900m by the end of the year. When it’s making a loss of $221m a quarter on sales of $385m, there doesn’t seem any way out. Already initial sales estimates for 8500 are being scaled back, while Nokia is in free-fall. This is a train crash of epic proportions.

  2. in Italy, what ST wants, ST gets —> definitely true.
    As personal comment, ST doesn’t even want 300mm…
    ST was once making “Zillions”, a term to be intended more like poetic license. You should know Italy is “land of poets, saints, explorers, navigators..”
    As for ST financials, profits in Analog & MEMS division are sunk by the train crash that is ST-Ericsson.

  3. Well [Anonymous] I assume that, in Italy, what ST wants, ST gets, and I understand ST doesn’t want 450mm. As for making zillions – I see Q2 profit was $83 million.

  4. Hi David,
    I take your comment as a typical british humour…
    I’ve always thought that is shareholder’s nationality that matters in the end, not really the headquarters location or fiscal registration. In ST’s case, it’s more than correct to say is a franco-italian (…and state owned) company. About who has more semiconductor industry, if UK or Italy, I want just to remind that ST is making zillions with its 8″ MEMS and analog fabs in Agrate and Catania, and Micron Avezzano 8″ fab is supplying image sensors to Aptina. If comparing to the current UK landscape, suffice to remember the fate of fabs in Scotland (NEC, Freescale), or in Newcastle πŸ™
    Well, Italy has indeed a lot of experienced people in semiconductor industry, but as the previous example suggest, mostly skilled in More than Moore applications, which do not really need 450mm. Sadly, as politics is the decision maker here, I have to say that italian politicians lack interest in semiconductors (and high tech altogether), so I see sponsorship for an italian participation in the 450mm race as highly improbable.

  5. Yes Mike, but I would point out on Jason’s behalf that Agrate and Catania are Dutch fabs because that it is the country in which ST is incorporated and, by the same reasoning, Avezzano is an American fab.

  6. @ Jason : Italy has STM fabs at Agrate (75k wpm) and Catania (70k wpm, plus Micron fab at Avezzano (50k wpm). I think it’s more the UK that has virtually no semiconductor industry !!

  7. I suppose ST could take exception to the last remark, Jason, but, since it’s registered in Holland and headquartered in Switzerland, it’s totally arguable that it isn’t Italian. And, I surmise, that makes you wonder why Italians run it.

  8. Given that EU is run by politics and the current state of fiscal crisis, it wouldn’t surprise me if they pick one of the PIIGS countries.
    Greece has cheap and skilled labor but has earthquakes(not everywhere).
    Ireland is much more expensive but is closer to UK/DE/NL/FR where the customers are and more experience people in semiconductors.
    Portugal/Spain are somewhere in the middle in this.
    Italy has virtually no semiconductor industry.

  9. As the article said, the location of the fab has nothing to do with proximity and everything to do with national/regional politics and especially economics.

  10. Not Greece – too many earthquakes! (Same is true of Turkey as well).

  11. If a fab needs to service both Asia(India) and North-Europe.. why not locate it in-between… Israel or Greece for example.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*