AI Edge Inference is Totally Different to Data Center
By Geoff Tate, Flex Logix
EETimes (July 23, 2020)
While inference accelerators started out primarily in the data center, they have quickly moved to edge inference with applications such as autonomous driving and medical imaging. Through this transition, customers are finding out, often the hard way, that the same accelerator that did so well processing images in the data center fails badly in edge inference. The reason for this is simple: one processes a pool of data while the other processes a stream.
Streaming throughput is when you process at batch = 1 and a pool is when you process batch = many. In the data center, customers are typically processing pools of data such as photos that are being tagged. The goal is getting through as many photos as possible with the least amount of resources and power consumption, and best latency.
Edge inference applications, on the other hand, need to process a stream of data. These customers usually have a camera that is producing 30 frames per second and each frame is typically 2 megapixels. Typically, that works out to be 33 milliseconds per image for about 30 frames per second. When you have an image that is coming in from a stream, how it is processed depends on what it needs to do.
|E-mail This Article||Printer-Friendly Page|
Search Silicon IP
- SoC design: When is a network-on-chip (NoC) not enough?
- Integrating VESA DSC and MIPI DSI in a System-on-Chip (SoC): Addressing Design Challenges and Leveraging Arasan IP Portfolio
- High-Speed PCIe and SSD Development and Challenges
- How AI (Artificial Intelligence) Is Transforming the Aerospace Industry