Industry Expert Blogs

For many systems the best processor is one tailored for its task

A couple of years ago, Erik McClure (a Microsoft software developer, at the time) published a blog entitled, RISC Is Fundamentally Unscalable.

This blog was really quite interesting and made some very good points about the limitations of a pure RISC design.

THE LIMITATIONS OF A PURE RISC DESIGN

It takes me back: some of my first marketing tasks were around the religious war between RISC & CISC.

However, to a degree, I think Erik’s blog overstates things: nobody today really thinks of RISC-V as being just RISC.

That religious war is long-gone: we have all read Hennessy & Patterson, we all know to use quantitative technique and metrics to analyze performance and to make the inevitable trade-offs. Complex instructions, deeper pipelines, faster/cleaner architectures, power versus area versus performance – those are solved by modelling & data not simplistic binary divides or theological purity.

A key principle of RISC-V from its inception was the ability to add instructions, and there are a number of defined extensions, as optional modules.

There certainly are products using standard RISC-V cores with the standard base ISA. But there are many products with extensions. And for many applications you can do even better.

Click here to read more ...