Apple vs Qualcomm: Who Extorted Whom?
Apple would have gone with WiMAX, if Qualcomm hadn't agreed to pay to Apple
Junko Yoshida, EETimes
9/6/2017 00:01 AM EDT
MADISON, Wis. — A dispute that has now escalated into an epic legal battle between technology juggernauts, Apple and Qualcomm, is complex and multi-layered, its facets all loosely connected and geographically sprawling.
The simple narrative, told by Apple, is that Qualcomm has illegally maintained a monopoly over the semiconductors used in cellphones.
The U.S. Fair Trade Commission (FTC) has argued that Qualcomm customers "accept elevated patent royalties they otherwise would refuse" because they’re forced "to negotiate in the shadow of Qualcomm's threat to withhold chips." As a result, "Qualcomm collects far more in royalties than other licensors in the industry with comparable patent portfolios."
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
Related News
Breaking News
- RAAAM Memory Technologies Closes $4M Seed Round to Commercialize Super Cost Effective On-Chip Memory Solutions
- Alphawave Semi Audited Results for the Year Ended 31 December 2023
- Qualitas Semiconductor Appoints HSRP as its Distributor for the China Markets
- Huawei Mate 60 Pro processor made on SMIC 7nm N+2 process
- Silicon Creations Reaches Milestone of 10 Million Wafers in Production with TSMC
Most Popular
- GUC provides 3DIC ASIC total service package to AI/HPC/Networking customers
- Omni Design Technologies Joins Intel Foundry Accelerator IP Alliance
- Faraday Partners with Arm to Innovate AI-driven Vehicle ASICs
- Semiconductor Capacity Is Up, But Mind the Talent Gap
- Efabless Announces the Release of the OpenLane 2 Development Platform, Transforming Custom Silicon Design Flows