USB V3.1 Power Delivery Type-C Port Evaluation board for OTI9108 IP
Apple M1 Processor, Passing on the Chiplets
By Don Scansen, EETimes (November 13, 2020)
Recent angry comments to EE Times‘ interview with Intel’s Ramune Nagisetty disparaged the current heterogenous integration and chiplet discussions as more of a rehash than an innovation and furthermore simply a way for American manufacturers to obfuscate their inability to stay at the leading edge of wafer fabrication. Although a great deal of the package-level integration that has been discussed is not ground-breaking innovation, there is little doubt that we are in the middle of a significant shift in integration away from system-on-chip (SoC) design.
Espousing the virtues of the SoC approach after that introduction is odd timing, but the latest foray into chip design at Apple was just announced. The M1, based around a custom piece of Apple SoC silicon, will power the new Macbook Air as well as some Macbook Pro and Mac Mini models. If we can take the promotional images provided by Apple at face value, calling the M1 processor die an SoC is certainly no understatement. Taking all due blame for my focus on the chiplet approach to integration, there is none of that here. Looking at the M1 die photo from Apple, breaking this type of design up into chiplets would not be an attractive prospect. The additional interconnection and communication overhead would create more headaches than it’s worth.
The other argument in favor of the SoC approach for Apple is that they are mostly past the point of using anyone else’s physical layout IP cores. They are responsible for the bulk of all the circuit blocks and focusing their efforts on keeping tight control over physical design and the hardware-software integration to optimize the system and (presumably) improve the user experience. They wouldn’t be buying either a vendor designed piece of silicon or hard IP core to be stitched into their processor design.
Before comparing the pure SoC design to current layouts that might be more amenable to a chiplet approach, there are a couple more things to mention about the M1.
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
Related News
- intoPIX unveils new FastTicoRAW & FastTicoXS codecs for Apple silicon and makes the switch to ARM-based technology simple
- Apple sues processor startup for theft of trade secrets
- Probing the Apple M1's Hidden Depths
- CEA-Leti Presents High-Performance Processor Breakthrough With Active Interposer and 3D Stacked Chiplets at ISSCC 2020
- Report: Apple working on neural processor
Breaking News
- Omni Design Technologies Joins Intel Foundry Accelerator IP Alliance
- Efabless Announces the Release of the OpenLane 2 Development Platform, Transforming Custom Silicon Design Flows
- TSMC Reports First Quarter EPS of NT$8.70
- Brisbane Silicon publishes DPTx 1.4 IP Core
- GUC provides 3DIC ASIC total service package to AI/HPC/Networking customers
Most Popular
- U.S. Subsidy for TSMC Has AI Chips, Tech Leadership in Sight
- Cadence Unveils Palladium Z3 and Protium X3 Systems to Usher in a New Era of Accelerated Verification, Software Development and Digital Twins
- Zhuhai Chuangfeixin: OTP IP Based on 90nm CMOS Image Sensor Process Technology Successfully Mass Production
- Silvaco Announces Expanded Partnership with Micron Technology
- OPENEDGES Unveils ENLIGHT Pro: A High-Performance NPU IP Quadrupling its Previous Generation's Performance