Nov. 24, 2025 –
By Saumitra Jagdale, embedded.com
Despite being preferred by newly established companies that had the same needs for ISAs as their competition, they lacked the time and resources to deal with costly, complex proprietary ISAs.
While RISC-V was rightly preferred because of its open standard community and accessibility, it was not yet ready to replace competing architectures. Its fragmentation and immaturity often made prospective users lean back toward the secure capabilities of ARM and x86. There were also real technical challenges that, if not addressed, risked slowing RISC-V’s adoption compared to its predecessors.