Design & Reuse
Catalog of SIP Cores
System on Chip design resources

Making Neuromorphic Edge AI Design-Ready with Verified ECAD Models

BrainChip has partnered with Supplyframe to make its AKD1500 neuromorphic edge AI co-processor available as a design-ready component within the Supplyframe electronics design ecosystem.

August 3, 2026 -

A new edge AI processor becomes a practical design option once engineers can evaluate it inside a real system architecture. Engineers need to connect it to the host, define its power architecture, account for its package, and determine whether it fits the electrical, mechanical, and manufacturing constraints of the product.

To support that evaluation, verified schematic symbols, PCB footprints, and 3D ECAD models for BrainChip’s AKD1500 Akida chip will become available across more than 25 design-tool formats, including Altium Designer, KiCad, and Autodesk Eagle. The AKD1500 is a neuromorphic edge AI co-processor designed to accelerate low-power inference alongside a host CPU using PCIe or microcontroller using SPI for event-based computation.

This BrainChip-Supplyframe partnership gives engineers a more direct route from studying the AKD1500’s architecture to placing the device within a schematic and PCB layout. With the component definition already available, teams can focus earlier on the factors that determine if neuromorphic acceleration is suitable for the system, including host connectivity, board area, and prototype requirements.

Moving a Processor from Datasheet to Design

Before a processor can be assessed at system level, its datasheet information must be translated into design assets the ECAD environment can use. The schematic symbol defines how engineers interact with the device electrically, the footprint determines how it will be mounted and routed on the PCB, and the 3D model establishes its physical position within the assembled product.

Creating these assets manually requires engineers or component librarians to interpret pin tables, package drawings, pad dimensions, pitch, orientation markers, and mechanical tolerances. Each value must then be entered correctly into the selected ECAD platform and checked against the manufacturer’s documentation.

This work is especially consequential for a processor with numerous power, ground, control, and data connections. A symbol with an incorrect pin assignment, for instance, can propagate an electrical error into the schematic. Similarly, a footprint with the wrong pad geometry or package orientation can create assembly problems, while an inaccurate 3D model can lead to conflicts with an enclosure, heatsink, connector, or neighboring component.

Some errors are identified during schematic review or design-rule checking; others remain undetected until PCB fabrication, assembly, or prototype bring-up, when correcting them becomes substantially more expensive. Even an accurate manually created model must often be reviewed internally before a design team is willing to use it in production work...

Click here to read more