Design Reuse
Search EETimes
Silicon IP Verification IP Software IP Wanted IP !!! Free Download IP Analytics (Restricted Access) FPGA Board / Kit Design Services Foundries Main IP/SoC Products Embedded Systems Design Platform / Structured ASIC Foundries FPGA / CPLD Fabless / IDM Deals Legal Business Financial Results People ESL Design Commentary / Analysis Main Silicon IP / SoC Verification IP FPGA / CPLD Embedded Systems Design Platform / Structured ASIC ESL Design ESL Design Standards & Best Practice Structured ASIC Verification IP Main On Cores Embedded Systems EDA Tools IP Cores Tool Demos D&R Partners Research / Market Reports Events Calendar Webcasts / Podcasts Online Bookstore


Commentary / Analysis: Real men have fabs, but maybe not Infineon, NXP, TI and ST.


Related News

Breaking News

Most Popular (Updated Daily)

February 2, 2007 -- In the wake of the fab-lite strategies, possibly moving to fabless strategies, of NXP, Infineon, Texas Instruments and STMicroelectronics, the pros and cons of having a fab were listed during IFS2007 in London this week organised by analysts Future Horizons.

The first argument is the cost argment. Some say that, at $3bn, fabs are too expensive. But if you look at their cost in relation to the market size, their cost is the same.

A fab cost $40m in 1970 when the industry TAM was $2.4bn; they cost $330m in 1985 when the TAM was $21.5bn; they cost $3bn in 2005 when the TAM was $245bn. That’s a 14.1 per cent CAGR over 25 years fro both the market and the fab-cost. So there’s no change in cost.

“It’s just that you have to bet the company when you build a fab, and people have lost the stomach for betting the company”, said Future Horizons CEO, Malcolm Penn

Click here to read more ...





E-mail This Article Printer-Friendly Page


<A HREF="http://www.design-reuse.com/banner/exit.php?id=445" target="_top"><IMG SRC="http://www.us.design-reuse.com/adserver/www/images/eureka_static.jpg" WIDTH=125 HEIGHT=125 BORDER=0></A>